Contracts for healthcare services procured for the purpose of the health service in England by an Integrated Care Board, NHS Trust or Foundation Trust, local authority or combined authority responsible for healthcare services may only be modified in the circumstances set out in the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023 (PSR).
Unlike non-healthcare contracts which are modified under the Regime under which they were procured (Procurement Act 2023 (Commencement No. 3 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Regulations 2024), healthcare contracts are modified under the PSR whether the contract was entered into before or after the PSR came into force on 1 January 2024.
Unless an authority needs to urgently modify a healthcare contract in unforeseen circumstances not attributable to that authority (which is dealt with under regulation 14), regulation 13 of the PSR provides that a healthcare contract can only be modified during its term without a new procurement process where:
(a) the contract was awarded under Direct Award Process A (where healthcare services can only be provided by the existing provider) or Direct Award Process B (where there is an unrestricted number of providers for patient choice) and the modification does not render the contract or framework agreement materially different in character;
(b) the nature and scope of the modification is clearly and unambiguously provided for in the contract or framework agreement documents;
(c) the modification is solely a change in the identity of the provider due to succession into the position of provider following corporate changes including takeover, merger, acquisition or insolvency and the authority is satisfied that the provider meets the basic selection criteria;
(d) the modification is made in response to external factors beyond the control of the authority and the provider (such as changes in patient or service user volume, or changes in prices in accordance with a formula provided for in the contract documents) and the modification does not render the contract or framework agreement materially different in character; or
(e) the modification is attributable to a decision of the authority and does not materially alter the character of the contract or framework agreement, and the cumulative change in the lifetime value of the contract or framework agreement (compared to the original contract value) is under £500,000 or under 25%.
Where the cumulative change in the contract value from the original contract value is £500,000 or more, the authority must publish a notice of contract or framework agreement modification on Find a Tender Service within 30 days.
NHS England has provided a helpful process map and flowchart in the PSR toolkit: Contract modification end-to-end process map and Contract modification flowchart.
If an authority made a modification that was not permitted, it would in effect be a direct award of a new contract without a procurement process and would breach the PSR. As providers of healthcare services cannot bring a procurement challenge in the courts (as they could for a non healthcare contract under the Procurement Act 2023 or the previous regime if procured earlier), providers could potentially seek judicial review of the decision to modify the contract or could request the opportunity to make a representation in relation to an effective direct award and then seek the involvement of the Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel.
Contact
Discover more
You may be interested in
The Procurement Act 2023: 10 months on, how is it going?
Technology-enabled care in the UK: Legal and technical developments to watch
Browne Jacobson comments on NHS Confederation report
Press release: White paper sets out recommendations on increasing investment
Comprehensive guide to NHS wholly-owned subsidiaries
Top 10 legal considerations for NHS subsidiaries
Promoting commercial thinking within the NHS
Understanding the different types of later living housing
Early access service to launch for innovative medical devices
What does the 10-year health plan mean for social care?
Modification of public health contracts and routes to challenge a modification that is not permitted
Handling disputes during the standstill period under the Procurement Act 2023
Iechyd da to the Welsh Provider Selection Regime
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in public sector procurements
Maximising commercial income for the NHS
Taking account of a supplier’s approach to payment in major contracts procurement (PPN015 and PPN018): What is new?
Embedding social value in procurement
Decisions of the Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel
Procurement Act 2023 implementation date delayed: Here’s what you need to do now
Regulation HealthTech: What the Provider Selection Regime means for healthcare procurement
Challenges under the Provider Selection Regime: How should commissioners handle representations?
Browne Jacobson appoints Jan Cumming as legal director to Government practice
Provider Selection Regime - how will it work in practice?
Landmark judgment in OCS Group UK Limited v Community Health Partnerships Limited
Braceurself Ltd v NHS England 2024: Court of Appeal procurement case decision
Provider Selection Regime – change is coming, what does it mean for you?
Procurement Bill: Competitive flexible procedure, how will this work in practice?
Procurement Bill - Are they still playing ping-pong?
InLaw: the start of the EPR convergence journey
Case summary: the importance of bringing a procurement claim within the appropriate time limits
'Getting ready to reform – preparing for the new Procurement Bill' webinar
Automatic suspension and procurement law
Procurement Bill debarment regime and ECHR issues
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Public procurement: key facts and compliance considerations
How AI and technology can transform the healthcare sector
Procurement Bill - what’s new in 2022?
CCGs’ conduct “sufficiently serious” for award of damages in High Court procurement case
This case provides a reminder to contracting authorities that whilst the bar for an award of damages in procurement cases is high, following the Supreme Court ruling in Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority [2017] 1 WLR 1373, it is not insurmountable when a contracting authority has acted with disregard to the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCRs). There is also further guidance as to the use of frameworks