Various proceedings are being issued around the world following the investigation into the ILS platform, Vesttoo, which uncovered a US$4bn fraud involving fraudulent letters of credit.
Vesttoo was an Israeli fintech startup founded in 2018 by Yaniv Bertele, Ben Zickel and Alon Lifshitz. It was a platform designed to connect insurance companies with capital market investors acting as an alternative to traditional reinsurers. Investors would purchase what was known as an ‘insurance basket’ and would receive a payment for the risk they were taking on – and share the losses in the event of an insurance event. Vesttoo developed a platform that would mediate between insurers and investors to ensure the transactions were properly conducted. Part of that process included ensuring that the investors had the appropriate collateral, usually in the form of letters of credit.
Earlier this year there were reports of ‘inconsistencies’ at Vesttoo following the discovery of a fake letter of credit that had not been detected by Vesttoo’s systems. A comprehensive review of all Vesttoo’s letters of credit led to the discovery of a significant fraud involving multiple fraudulent letters of credit all being issued by the same bank. The fraud is reported to have required the cooporation of the bank’s employees as well as those within Vesttoo, which would have received billions of dollars of commission from the fraudulent transactions. The Vesttoo board initially put on leave and then subsequently fired two of the founding members, Bertele and Lifshitz. It has been reported that the individuals were directly involved in creating fake documents and forging identities to obtain billions of dollars in bogus letters of credit.
Proceedings have been issued against Vesttoo by Aon White Rock, which is facing its own legal action over transactions involving allegedly fraudulent letters of credit related to Vestoo. There are proceedings in the Bermudan Supreme Court to liquidate segregated cells in White Rock Insurance (SAC) which had housed the reinsurance deals and a court in Israel has approved the seizure of $30m in assets belonging to Bertel and Lifshitz.
Vesttoo has since filed for bankruptcy following the closure of multiple offices and legal discovery on the company is expected to start shortly.
The fallout of the Vesttoo fraud could have wider implications on the re/insurance industry with a potential crisis of confidence in the use of letters of credit as a valid form of collateral. Letters of credit are considered as a Tier 2 form of capital at Lloyd’s and are widely relied on by insurers and reinsurers. In an industry that habitually uses fronting companies and risk transformers a successful chain of security relies on adequate due diligence being carried out on all parties involved. Where that trust has been undermined, the insurance industry may see a tightening up of the scrutiny of the use of letters of credit in alternative reinsurance structures.
Although the fraud could be an (admittedly sizeable) isolated incident involving a few untrustworthy individuals, whilst the source of the fraud is being investigated, the insurance industry can expect to see more diligence and greater transparency around letters of credit, possibly with those relying on them limiting the use to an approved list of banks. In the meantime, unless and until the Vesttoo events indicate that the use of letters of credit is a flawed system, it is likely that they will continue as a form of collateral, though recent events should serve as a reminder to the insurance industry that it is essential that there are strong checks and balances conducted at every stage.
Contents
- London Market, Autumn 2023: What the insurance market needs to know
- Covid BI litigation (Autumn 2023): Insurance coverage disputes update
- Energy insurance: Technip Saudi Arabia Limited v The Mediterranean and Gulf Cooperative Insurance an
- Trade credit: Australian Courts consider the meaning of ‘recoveries’
- D&O: Australian Courts consider the meaning of ‘personal advantage'
- Climate change related insurance decisions being made around the world
- Al Mana Lifestyle Trading L.L.C. & Others v United Fidelity Insurance Company PSC & Others [2023] EW
- Proposed amendments to the Arbitration Act 1996
- Chubb leads a $50m consortium to help mitigate the increasing risks associated with lithium-ion batt
You may be interested in...
Horizon scanning: FCA's anticipated priorities for 2026
FCA fines Nationwide £44m for financial crime control failings: Key lessons for firms
The AI arms race: Fraudsters vs insurers in the battle against fake claims
FCA's first AML enforcement against professional body supervisor: Key compliance lessons for firms
What does the new offence under the ECCTA 2023 mean for corporate accountability and insurers?
The Lloyd’s Market Association’s General Sanctions Financial Crime Documentation Clause
The National Food Crime Unit: Will new powers make a difference to tackling food fraud?
Addressing insurance fraud: Aviva's response and industry-wide implications
Browne Jacobson expands international disputes offering with new Head of Commercial Dispute Resolution in London
How universities can navigate the new 'failure to prevent fraud' offence
AI is creating fraudulent claims
Navigating the new 'failure to prevent fraud' offence: What organisations need to know
Environmental crime and the impact for insurers
Carbon fraud prompts insurance response
Romance fraud, online scams and cyber fraud: How banks are now protecting your money
Strengthening the fight against financial crime: A unified approach
Financial Crime Watch: October 2024
Is Companies House turning the tide against facilitators of fraud?
Starling: Paying the price for failures in financial crime systems and controls
Will the Online Safety Act help reduce Google ad spoofing in insurance?
FRC awards financial sanctions against MacIntyre Hudson LLP and two former employees for breach of audit requirements
Publication of Home Office’s Preliminary Findings and Direction of Travel in relation to the disclosure process
Court of Appeal upholds decision on professional indemnity policy exclusions in insurer's appeal
The EU AI Act: What does it mean for insurers?
AI deep fake fraud exposed - five key lessons and how we need to respond
FCA writes to MPs over car insurance premiums. What do increases mean for fraud?
The Home Affairs Committee launched another inquiry into fraud - Stop! Think Fraud
The downfall of Vesttoo: Fraudulent letters of credit
Failure to prevent fraud: how can my organisation prepare?
Fraud Strategy: Stopping Scams and Protecting the Public
The House of Lords Fraud Act 2006 and Digital Fraud Select Committee Report
Sanctions round-up - May 2023
SFO secures first conviction for individual connected to Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Fraud – early success for the SFO
Financial Crime Watch - May 2023
New fraud offence to be introduced in the new Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill
Economic crime and cybercrime
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
Lying on your CV – what can possibly go wrong?
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.
Facing the threat of cyber security breaches
Universities and colleges are not immune from deception by unscrupulous bad actors. The extent to which educational institutions can manage and control risk not only depends on financial management and internal controls, but also the robustness of security and processes which can be exploited from outside the organisation.
Integrated Care Boards and preventing NHS fraud – what you need to know and how to achieve it
On 7 July this year, NHS England published its statutory guidance for Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and with it set out the ICBs’ role and responsibilities and how they should collaborate, interact and carry out their anti-fraud, bribery and corruption functions in concert with NHS England.